
My PB Wiki site on teaching satire is now launched. Contents include resources on literary, film, and artworks of satire, as well as explication of satirical structures. Check it out!
Teaching Satire
(That was the thrilling opener of my first journal in 1986) Hopefully, this blog will somehow surpass that humble beginning in both actual excitement and interest level.

Above is the trailer to American Gangster... I will analyze the trailer as a representation of the film, which I did see.
I'd like to analyze this film from a critical discourse perspective, specifically the perspective of race... and then from an audience perspective. I am assuming you've seen the film, and if you haven't you may want to pass and return, once you have...
We'll start with an audience perspective. Three things I look for in a film that I am paying full price for at the theater: 1. Bigness... If I am seeing this film at the theater, something about this film should need to be big. Big sound, sweeping landscapes, action. Quiet dramas, and chick flicks do not need to be viewed on the big screen. 2. Good acting / script. I don't like to have my intelligence insulted by films with bad acting or cheesy scripts. Some comedies get exempted from this rule... but I am looking for some quality, otherwise it can wait for dvd viewing. 3. thought provoking ideas. despite genre, there should be something about this film that I could take away to think further about or discuss with someone else. If I come out of a movie, and there is nothing to really say, I will feel like I've wasted money...
On to the movie at hand:
Bigness: This movie was big in its cast... with both Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe as Best Actor Oscar winners, a soundtrack with latest rappers like Jay Z, and a volatile and sometimes violent setting. 1968, Harlem, based on true story. 2. Acting was great in this film. Crowe plays an intelligent and honest, but kind of dumpy Jersey cop. Washington is a totally polished, yet subtle and rising drug lord. 3. Thought provoking. There are a lot of trains of discussion one could take on this movie. It was very well done, and the social, racial implications are very interesting... as well as a historical piece... I'll talk more about those things below. So, as far as audience is concerned, I found this to be a film that stands to my criticism.
more to come...


So, we're on the way out of a staff meeting convo about classroom management. We have largely decided that success often becomes about entertainment, since you can't actually force inner change on students, and it's hard to intrinsically motivate students to learn things that they aren't interested in or won't move them towards their goals. A colleague says, "It is basically just about building a better mouse trap." Or, in other words, if we can trick them into thinking we're giving them something useful, then we can get them. He was being sarcastic, but it was a phrase I hadn't heard before... I guess it is somewhat common in business circles as "If you can build a better mouse trap, they will beat a path to your door." It turns out the original quote is from Ralph Waldo Emerson: "If a man can write a better book, preach a better sermon, or make a better mousetrap, than his neighbor, though he build his house in the woods, the world will make a beaten path to his door." The big question: What if you don't actually need a mouse trap? What if the mouse doesn't actually need cheese? So, much of marketing and ads isn't about promoting things that meet needs, but about creating needs alongside products to fill them.
http://www.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/competitiveness/index.html
This is the cover of the 17 page initiative that offers college money to students if they take extra math and science classes. The report is full of the same old research about how we are getting beat by other countries with smart kids... About how China is producing half of the future scientists of the world (or something like that) This is all well and good. I am all about kids getting free money for school, but the sentiment from the original poster smacks of the old space race promotions... except denying that the real reason we are pushing "competitiveness" is for the purposes of defensive (and more honestly) offensive military technologies. If we were to just spend less on these technologies, how much more fundage would be available to put right into education, instead of having to let it trickle down... What if kids could then take not only higher mathematics, and sciences, but vocational classes? What if we could provide a wider variety of intrinsically motivating choices in all academic areas?


bscribing I would realize that they weren't active anymore. A second problem being when the links no longer have video files in them, so that you can't even go back and watch the old posts. Anyway, Chasing Windmills was sort of an artsy weekly drama, filmed by people that appeared to know what they were doing, and including characters that reappeared and developed over time. Another point of interest, was that the locale was the Minneapolis area, so many familiar places show up like the Walker Art Center, etc. Also notable is that the creators of Chasing Windmills used Blogger as their platform.